Wednesday, December 23, 2009
Top 11 Albums of 2009 [updated]
rollercoaster.
We’re somewhere in between, our feet are on the ground, but we’re walking around in the sky. That’s our reality, that’s where we’re stuck as Christians. Redemption’s found us, we’ve been rescued, but we’re still in a desperate spot.
I think there are moments that happen in life that transcend our everyday experience. I think a lot of times, corporate worship is that. It seems like your feet leave the ground for a second or two, and you get this picture of what eternity might be, but then you’re right back into the grind, Monday comes and your feet are back on the ground but here we are again trying to figure out what it means to be alive and rescued at the same time."
Sunday, December 6, 2009
discipline.
Tuesday, December 1, 2009
noose.
Shane Claiborne: Communicating Through a Noose
"What do you think of that man?" the old guy asked in a raspy voice as I settled in next to him on the plane. He pointed to the face of Saddam Hussein on the front of his newspaper with a headline story of the looming execution. I gathered myself, and prepared for what could turn out to be a rather chatty plane ride. I replied gently, "I think that man needs some love." And the rather boisterous gentleman sat still, perhaps not exactly the response he predicted. Then he said pensively, "Hmmmm. I think you're right..." And finally, he whispered in a forlorn tone, "And it is hard to communicate love through a noose."
Sometimes we just need permission to say, "It's not okay to kill someone to show everyone how much we hate killing." As Christian artist Derek Webb sings, " Peace by way of war is like purity by way of fornication. It's like saying murder is wrong and showing them by way of execution." I am encouraged by how many Christians I hear voicing an alternative to the myth of redemptive violence in light of the recent killing of Saddam, folks who love Jesus and have the unsettling feeling that Jesus loves evildoers so much he died for them, for us. I have heard many evangelicals who see Saddam's execution as the ultimate act of hopelessness and faithlessness – after all it is humanity stepping in to make the final judgment, that this human created in God's image is beyond redemption. And for those who believe in hell, executing someone who may not yet know of the love and grace of Christ is doubly offensive.
It is rather scandalous to think that we have a God who loves murderers and terrorists like Saul of Tarsus, Osama bin Laden, or Sadaam Hussein – but that is the "good news" isn't it? It's the old eye for an eye thing that gets us. But the more I've studied the Hebrew Scriptures the more I am convinced that this was just a boundary for people who lashed back. As the young exodus people are trying to discover a new way of living outside the empire, God made sure there were some boundaries, like if someone breaks your are, you cannot go back and break their arm and their leg. If someone kills hundreds of your people, you cannot kill 160,000 of theirs.
We've learned the eye for an eye thing all too well. A shock and awe bombing leads to a shock and awe beheading. A Pearl Harbor leads to a Hiroshima. A murder leads to an execution. A rude look leads to a cold shoulder. An eye for an eye we have indeed heard before and learned its logic all too well. But Jesus comes declaring in his State of the Union Sermon on the Mount address (Matthew 5): "You have heard that it was said, 'Eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth,'" but there is a another way. No wonder Jesus wept over Jerusalem because the people "did not know the things that make for peace."
Gandhi and King used to say, "An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth leaves the whole world blind" (and with dentures). The gospels tell the story of a group of people who have dragged forward an adulteress and are ready to stone her (this was the legal consequence). Jesus is asked for his support of this death penalty case. His response is this... "You are all adulterers. If you have looked at someone lustfully, you have committed adultery in your heart." And the people drop their stones and walk away with their heads bowed. We want to kill the murderers, and Jesus says to us: "You are all murderers. If you have called your neighbor 'Raca, Fool' you are guilty of murder in your heart." Again the stones drop. We are all murderers and adulterers and terrorists. And we are all precious.
When we have new eyes we can look into the faces of those we don't even like, and see the One we love. We can see God's image in everyone we encounter. As Henri Nouwen puts it: "In the face of the oppressed I recognize my own face and in the hands of the oppressor I recognize my own hands. Their flesh is my flesh, their blood is my blood, their p ain is my pain, their smile is my smile." We are made of the same dust. We cry the same tears. No one is beyond redemption and no one is beyond repute. And that is when we are free to imagine a revolution that sets both the oppressed and the oppressors free. The world is starving for grace. And grace is hard to communicate with a noose.
Shane Claiborne is a founding partner of The Simple Way Community, a radical faith community that lives among and serves the homeless in Kensington, North Philadelphia. He is a Red Letter Christian and the author of The Irresistible Revolution.
Sunday, November 22, 2009
laansma.
where God is just so good?
when you can see how God moves as clearly as the person in front of you?
when the only thing to do is run and jump with joy?
when you realize that all of your problems are so small?
where you see God orchestrating everything?
when you realize how foolish you would be to do things on your own?
when there are no words to describe??
yea.. just had one of those days
source: http://1asagna.tumblr.com/
Wednesday, November 18, 2009
love.
What If Jesus Meant All That Stuff?
By Shane Claiborne
The Simple Way
To all my nonbelieving, sort-of-believing, and used-to-be-believing friends: I feel like I should begin with a confession. I am sorry that so often the biggest obstacle to God has been Christians. Christians who have had so much to say with our mouths and so little to show with our lives. I am sorry that so often we have forgotten the Christ of our Christianity.
Forgive us. Forgive us for the embarrassing things we have done in the name of God.
The other night I headed into downtown Philly for a stroll with some friends from out of town. We walked down to Penn's Landing along the river, where there are street performers, artists, musicians. We passed a great magician who did some pretty sweet tricks like pour change out of his iPhone, and then there was a preacher. He wasn't quite as captivating as the magician. He stood on a box, yelling into a microphone, and beside him was a coffin with a fake dead body inside. He talked about how we are all going to die and go to hell if we don't know Jesus.
Some folks snickered. Some told him to shut the hell up. A couple of teenagers tried to steal the dead body in the coffin. All I could do was think to myself, I want to jump up on a box beside him and yell at the top of my lungs, "God is not a monster." Maybe next time I will.
The more I have read the Bible and studied the life of Jesus, the more I have become convinced that Christianity spreads best not through force but through fascination. But over the past few decades our Christianity, at least here in the United States, has become less and less fascinating. We have given the atheists less and less to disbelieve. And the sort of Christianity many of us have seen on TV and heard on the radio looks less and less like Jesus.
At one point Gandhi was asked if he was a Christian, and he said, essentially, "I sure love Jesus, but the Christians seem so unlike their Christ." A recent study showed that the top three perceptions of Christians in the U. S. among young non-Christians are that Christians are 1) antigay, 2) judgmental, and 3) hypocritical. So what we have here is a bit of an image crisis, and much of that reputation is well deserved. That's the ugly stuff. And that's why I begin by saying that I'm sorry.
Now for the good news.
I want to invite you to consider that maybe the televangelists and street preachers are wrong — and that God really is love. Maybe the fruits of the Spirit really are beautiful things like peace, patience, kindness, joy, love, goodness, and not the ugly things that have come to characterize religion, or politics, for that matter. (If there is anything I have learned from liberals and conservatives, it's that you can have great answers and still be mean... and that just as important as being right is being nice.)
The Bible that I read says that God did not send Jesus to condemn the world but to save it... it was because "God so loved the world." That is the God I know, and I long for others to know. I did not choose to devote my life to Jesus because I was scared to death of hell or because I wanted crowns in heaven... but because he is good. For those of you who are on a sincere spiritual journey, I hope that you do not reject Christ because of Christians. We have always been a messed-up bunch, and somehow God has survived the embarrassing things we do in His name. At the core of our "Gospel" is the message that Jesus came "not [for] the healthy... but the sick." And if you choose Jesus, may it not be simply because of a fear of hell or hope for mansions in heaven.
Don't get me wrong, I still believe in the afterlife, but too often all the church has done is promise the world that there is life after death and use it as a ticket to ignore the hells around us. I am convinced that the Christian Gospel has as much to do with this life as the next, and that the message of that Gospel is not just about going up when we die but about bringing God's Kingdom down. It was Jesus who taught us to pray that God's will be done "on earth as it is in heaven." On earth.
One of Jesus' most scandalous stories is the story of the Good Samaritan. As sentimental as we may have made it, the original story was about a man who gets beat up and left on the side of the road. A priest passes by. A Levite, the quintessential religious guy, also passes by on the other side (perhaps late for a meeting at church). And then comes the Samaritan... you can almost imagine a snicker in the Jewish crowd. Jews did not talk to Samaritans, or even walk through Samaria. But the Samaritan stops and takes care of the guy in the ditch and is lifted up as the hero of the story. I'm sure some of the listeners were ticked. According to the religious elite, Samaritans did not keep the right rules, and they did not have sound doctrine... but Jesus shows that true faith has to work itself out in a way that is Good News to the most bruised and broken person lying in the ditch.
It is so simple, but the pious forget this lesson constantly. God may indeed be evident in a priest, but God is just as likely to be at work through a Samaritan or a prostitute. In fact the Scripture is brimful of God using folks like a lying prostitute named Rahab, an adulterous king named David... at one point God even speaks to a guy named Balaam through his donkey. Some say God spoke to Balaam through his ass and has been speaking through asses ever since. So if God should choose to use us, then we should be grateful but not think too highly of ourselves. And if upon meeting someone we think God could never use, we should think again.
After all, Jesus says to the religious elite who looked down on everybody else: "The tax collectors and prostitutes are entering the Kingdom ahead of you." And we wonder what got him killed?
I have a friend in the UK who talks about "dirty theology" — that we have a God who is always using dirt to bring life and healing and redemption, a God who shows up in the most unlikely and scandalous ways. After all, the whole story begins with God reaching down from heaven, picking up some dirt, and breathing life into it. At one point, Jesus takes some mud, spits in it, and wipes it on a blind man's eyes to heal him. (The priests and producers of anointing oil were not happy that day.)
In fact, the entire story of Jesus is about a God who did not just want to stay "out there" but who moves into the neighborhood, a neighborhood where folks said, "Nothing good could come." It is this Jesus who was accused of being a glutton and drunkard and rabble-rouser for hanging out with all of society's rejects, and who died on the imperial cross of Rome reserved for bandits and failed messiahs. This is why the triumph over the cross was a triumph over everything ugly we do to ourselves and to others. It is the final promise that love wins.
It is this Jesus who was born in a stank manger in the middle of a genocide. That is the God that we are just as likely to find in the streets as in the sanctuary, who can redeem revolutionaries and tax collectors, the oppressed and the oppressors... a God who is saving some of us from the ghettos of poverty, and some of us from the ghettos of wealth.
In closing, to those who have closed the door on religion — I was recently asked by a non-Christian friend if I thought he was going to hell. I said, "I hope not. It will be hard to enjoy heaven without you." If those of us who believe in God do not believe God's grace is big enough to save the whole world... well, we should at least pray that it is.
Your brother,
Shane
Source: http://www.esquire.com/features/best-and-brightest-2009/shane-claiborne-1209
Tuesday, October 27, 2009
majority.
Just ran across a site with a very compelling/interesting agenda, and I wanted to be sure to share it with others who I knew might find it interesting as well. The best way to get the idea of what they are trying to do is to watch these videos which are short and really helpful in understanding part of our government's spending crisis.
I won't go so far as to say the information is completely without fault or doesn't strive to push an agenda, but it does seem fairly accurate for the most part.
Let me know what you think.
http://truemajority.com/oreos/
(About government spending/overspending on military "defense")
http://www.truemajorityaction.org/bensbbs/
(About spending specifically on nuclear weapons)
Note: I'm not asking you to join this organization, I haven't myself, but I thought it would be beneficial to share this information.
Tuesday, August 25, 2009
illumination.
Tuesday, May 26, 2009
green.
We live in a fallen world. We live in a broken creation. We can read in the papers and see in the news the constant and seemingly unstoppable, ongoing damage human actions have taken on the planet, and it is rare to hear a Christian portray a sense of responsibility to our environment out of devotion to Kingdom living if at all. However, before humans fell away into this brokenness, God offered a look into the wholeness of what creation was intended to be. He offered a glimpse of a world that was thriving and healthy. And from this original plan it should be clear that the Father intended something more pure, something more complete, of creation.
So where might we start? In Genesis we can find a much clearer picture of what God intended the world to be than we can find on the nightly news. The creation story paints a picture of God’s intentions for wholeness in creation, and then it explains when mankind began to stray from a life of full satisfaction in the Father. It is my stance that this straying from the completeness of creation is the cause of the brokenness of our environment today, and in light of that brokenness, I also believe it is our duty and responsibility as Christians and stewards of God’s creation to defend the wholeness that God, the architect, originally foresaw in the world.
So let us start at the beginning. At the dawn of creation, the Lord formed each part of the world by simply speaking it into existence; the oceans, the land, the rivers, the mountains, the valleys, the creatures of the sea, the birds in the air, the beasts on the land, and everything else under the sun, God spoke into existence, all the while declaring his creation “good.” However, it was not until God spoke mankind into existence, and breathed into them the breath of life that the Lord declared his creation “very good.” It was in the creation of mankind that the triune God agreed that humans would bear the responsibility of, “[ruling] over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky, over the livestock and all the wild animals, and over all the creatures that move along the ground."[1] But God did not only entrust humanity with dominion over the earth in this passage, he also made it clear that mankind was created to image our Creator, the core purpose of our existence.
This short passage[2] will serve as the backbone for my theological discourse on the Christian ethical responsibility to God’s creation. From the original mention of creating humanity in verse twenty-six God declares humanity is to be made in ‘his’ own image and will be given dominion and responsibility over the rest of creation. Then in the next verse, readers are once again reminded as God creates mankind that all of mankind, male and female, were created in the image of God. Finally, the charge for these people living in the image of God to serve as rulers over creation is repeated in verse twenty-eight in order to emphasize the responsibility which God is entrusting humanity. Therefore, it seems clear to me that because God put such great care into creation, created mankind in God’s own image, and entrusted mankind to care for creation, that environmental stewardship is very much an issue that is close to God’s heart and something that is certainly an issue of faith even today.
It is worth noting, however, that this passage is often misinterpreted or misunderstood. Many Christians in America have actually used this very same passage in order to justify humanity’s right to do whatever it may with the world.[3] This understanding draws from the idea that the “rule” over the earth God granted mankind was not a rule of stewardship and caring for creation, but, rather, a complete dominion and tyranny over creation. It seems as though much of this misunderstanding comes because many people have misunderstood the calling to image God in his love and care as Creator of all things. It is clear to me that our God-given rule over creation is not one which allows us to destroy or exploit our environment, but one that is given out of the understanding that mankind was created to image a Creator who greatly cares for the wholeness and beauty he spoke into being.
How can we be so sure that God intended our “rule” over creation to be one of stewardship and not one of tyranny? We need only to look at the history of God’s model of leadership.[4] As we are to image God, it is our goal to reflect all of the characteristics we know of God and have seen displayed throughout biblical history. The narrative of Scripture has taught us that God is Lord and Ruler of all, but God is a just and righteous God whose name is Love. This model of God’s rule is also very clearly expressed in the Lord Jesus Christ. Although Jesus is Lord and proclaimed the Kingdom of God, he did so with peace, compassion, and love. Therefore, we would be remiss to assume the rule or dominion God granted mankind over the rest of creation in Genesis was to be one of tyranny and exploitation, because we were created to be an image of our Creator here on earth.
So it is clear that Scripture is, and always will be, read with some form of previously established worldview. Those worldviews will shape and mold the text into a certain understanding in one way or another. With the specific issue of environmentalism, Christians have often been at odds with the idea of responsibility to the environment as an issue of faith because of the divide that has opened between many members of the Christian community and the scientific community primarily over the debate of evolution versus creationism. This rift has created a hurdle to many Christians as they may find it difficult to align with the scientific community on the issue of environmental conservation when, in large, the scientific community refutes certain beliefs contained within conservative theology.[5] Therefore, it may be necessary to come to an understanding that Christianity and science are not mutually exclusive entities before delving into the concept of environmental responsibility.
There are many places in Scripture where God’s care for and delight in creation are on display. Throughout Scripture, it is shown that God cares for even the lowliest of creatures, but when truly taken into consideration, God’s love for creation is quite compelling. For example, just in the immediate context of Genesis 1:26-28 one can glean a few different points of the importance of creation to God. Just before the creation of mankind, as each of the other parts of creation was spoken into existence, we can see that the Father blessed each individual facet of his creation, declaring each of them “good.”[6] Therefore, despite humanity’s special gift of dominion over the other works of creation, mankind is to acknowledge the blessing that God has issued over all of nature.
We might also consider the importance of God’s actions through Noah and the flood.[7] God did not only order Noah to gather every living creature to be spared from destruction, but God remembered all the animals onboard the ark with Noah’s family and brought an end to the flood.[8] When the flood was over, God issued a covenant that included all of creation, saying, “Never again will I curse the ground because of man, […] And never again will I destroy all living creatures, as I have done.”[9] Clearly, God holds creation in a high regard, and man should as well in being stewards of that very same creation as the Creator offers an everlasting covenant to all of creation.
Evidence of care for creation can also be found in God’s commands such as, “Do not muzzle an ox while it is treading out the grain,” because an ox should be allowed to eat as it works.[10] It is also commanded in Deuteronomy that people are not to take a mother bird along with her eggs when seeking food.[11] And even in reference to vegetation, it is commanded that even when laying siege on a city over a long period of time, soldiers are not to cut down trees that bear fruit because it would be unnecessary to punish nature in process of besieging a city.[12] In citing these same three texts, Roger Gottlieb writes, “As humans pursue legitimate purposes—threshing grain, finding food, making war—there are limits to how we can treat other living things in pursuit of our own ends.”[13] So we can see in these passages that humanity’s “dominion” or “rule” clearly does not allow for blatant exploitation of our fellow created.
Even beyond humanity’s stewardship as opposed to tyranny over creation, is the idea that all of God’s creation is to live in communion, if not partnership. Obviously, mankind was created in the image of God to rule over the created (Genesis 1:26-28) and placed only a little lower than the heavenly beings (Psalm 8:5), but is it not clear that nature and the animals it contains are not also of great value simply because they were also created by God, for a purpose?[14] The inherent value of that which is created by God calls for a sense of respect from mankind and calls humanity to enter into communion with creation. One expression of this call to communion of the created is Sabbath.
In Exodus 20:8-10 and Deuteronomy 5:12-14, God commands the Israelites to keep Sabbath, not only for themselves, but also for the animals.[15] The Sabbath law is inclusive so that mankind will respect the animals God has placed under their rule. In Exodus 23:10-11, the Sabbath law is laid out for how humans are to give even the land a Sabbath rest. Those who work the fields are to use the land for six years, but on the seventh year they are to give the land rest. This Sabbath of the land is commanded so that people will not exploit the land and rob it of its fertility. This idea is supported by the account in Leviticus 25 and 26 where God asks the Israelites to trust in the sixth year of working the fields that God will provide more than enough for the Sabbath year. Therefore, the people of God are to trust in God and follow the command to give the land rest so that the land will continue to bear fruit.[16] These are just a few of the many references to God’s Sabbath law for all of creation that can be found in Scripture.
All of these references throughout Scripture clearly point back to God’s original intention for mankind’s role in creation, that is, to be a steward and a servant to the co-created. Seeing as how the earth and everything in it belongs to God the Creator (Psalm 24:1), and because God delights in the work of his hands, declaring it all “very good” (Genesis 1:31), there must be a greater sense of urgency among Christians today to be a part of God’s restorative work in creation. Because humanity was created in the image of God, we were created to reflect the heart, the deepest longings and desires, of God as well as reflect his rule over creation.[17] Therefore, it is imperative that Christians overcome the false barrier that stands between faith and science in order to begin the healing our environment so desperately needs.
In his essay on Christian environmentalism, Dr. Ray Bohlin made a point to reference Jesus’ parable of the talents in Matthew 25:14-30.[18] In his reference Dr. Bohlin poses a challenge to those of us who may be guilty of, in essence, burying our talents by not taking action about the deterioration of our environment. He does so by saying, “When Christ returns, His earth may well be handed back to Him rusted, corroded, polluted, and ugly. To what degree will you or I be held responsible?”[19] We are called to be good stewards of what was entrusted to us, and God entrusted us with stewardship over creation! We must take this charge seriously as an issue that derives from our devotion to reflect God’s image here on earth, and we must begin to take our places as agents of the restorative movement of God.
Bibliography
-- Bohlin, Ray. Leadership U. “Christian Environmentalism.” Probe Ministries International, 1992. http://www.leaderu.com/orgs/probe/docs/ecology.html. (accessed May 22, 2009).
-- Bouma-Prediger, Steven. For the Beauty of the Earth: A Christian Vision for Creation Care. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House Company, 2001
-- Bratton, Susan P. “Teaching Environmental Ethics from a Theological Perspective.” Religious Education 85, no. 1 (Winter 1990): 25-33.
-- DeWitt, Calvin D. Leadership U. “Three Biblical Principles For Environmental Stewardship.” Copyright: Au Sable Institute of Environmental Studies. http://www.leaderu.com/theology/environment.html. (accessed May 22, 2009).
-- Gottlieb, Roger S. A Greener Faith: Religious Environmentalism and Our Planet’s Future. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc., 2006.
-- Van Dyke, Fred and others. Redeeming Creation: The Biblical Basis for Environmental Stewardship. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1996.
[1] Genesis 1:26
[2] Genesis 1:26-28
[3] Ray Bohlin. Leadership U. “Christian Environmentalism.” Probe Ministries International, 1992. http://www.leaderu.com/orgs/probe/docs/ecology.html. Accessed May 22, 2009. It should also be noted that I specify “Christians in America” here only because of my own, limited experience with Christian environmentalism outside of America.
[4] Fred Van Dyke and others, Redeeming Creation: The Biblical Basis for Environmental Stewardship (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1996), 89-93.
[5] Susan P. Bratton “Teaching Environmental Ethics from a Theological Perspective.” Religious Education 85, no. 1 (Winter 1990): 26.
[6] Genesis 1:3-25. Steven Bouma-Prediger, For the Beauty of the Earth: A Christian Vision for Creation Care (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House Company 2001), 95.
[7] Bouma-Prediger, 97-99.
[8] Genesis 8:1
[9] Genesis 8:21
[10] Deut. 25:4
[11] Deut. 22:6-7
[12] Deut. 20:19
[13] Roger S. Gottlieb, A Greener Faith: Religious Environmentalism and Our Planet’s Future (New York: Oxford University Press, Inc., 2006), 25-26.
[14] Gottlieb, 26 (idea expressed in a quote from Andrew Linzey)
[15] Calvin D. DeWitt. Leadership U. “Three Biblical Principles For Environmental Stewardship.” Au Sable Institute of Environmental Studies. http://www.leaderu.com/theology/environment.html. Accessed May 22, 2009. Gottlieb, 26. Much of this section on the Sabbath draws from DeWitt’s essay and Gottlieb’s chapter.
[16] Leviticus 26:3
[17] Van Dyke, 95-98.